MI: How occupational licensing laws harm public safety and the formerly incarcerated

[www.rstreet.org – 5/31/18]

Key Points

1) Many occupational licensing laws condition employment on “good moral character,” but how exactly one demonstrates “good moral character” is entirely undefined.

2) Vague language affords boards extensive latitude in denying otherwise qualified people for reasons that may be entirely unrelated to the responsibilities of the job.

3) Not only do these practices fail to increase public safety, recent research has shown that they may make communities less safe by increasing the odds that a person will return to a life of crime.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

People meet sex offenders every day, unknowingly, but most likely they are not on the registry. Most people are ignorant of this, so they want their plumber to not have a past offense. This is a big mistake and It is only enabling and hiding offenders (actual, not former).

Reading this, it brings to my mind the scene from Shawshank Redemption where Red has to meet with the parole board. If you recall there are a couple instances in the movie where he was much younger when they denied him parole and then much older when they granted him parole.

First instance is where he feels he’s met their definition of rehabilitation, then the second instance is he tells them pretty much it doesn’t matter what they think because he knows inside already he rehabilitated was long ago.

Bring forth all those metrics and assessments, it truly is the person who really knows, not these professionals who like to have alphabet soup behind their name and make proclamations on paper. As we’ve been seeing here on this website with experiences through polygraphs, other assessments, and metrics that there is no set way.

If they truly judged the individuals who have these certifications and licenses daily, they would be ripping them away from everybody faster than they would be granting them because they would find something somewhere that someone has done which violates some rule or statute.

Actually these requirements even exist at the federal level.

Requirements like these were embedded in the Federal Communications Act of 1934 and have recently been revived in amateur radio license application forms.